BIICL Blog

Read our latest blog posts

Welcome to the BIICL Blog hosted by the research team at the British Institute of International and Comparative Law (BIICL)

Please note that the views and opinions expressed in this blog are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the official policy or position of BIICL.

Showing results for: Courts and Tribunals

Does the approach of the Multilateral Investment Court to appointment of judges appropriately balance interests of States and investors?

Puloma Mukherjee, Mark Konstantinidis | 3rd May 2023

On 6 December 2022, the Third Young Investment Treaty Forum Debate took…

Read More
Arbitration+2
Courts and TribunalsInvestment and Trade
Trafficked persons on trial in the United Kingdom: Court of Appeal provides new guidance on abuse of process and available defences

Noemi Magugliani | 7th April 2022

Section 45 of the 2015 Modern Slavery Act (MSA) established a statutory…

Read More
Courts and Tribunals+2
Human Rights and IHLModern Slavery
Reviewing the Review: What Needs to Change at the International Criminal Court?

2nd December 2020

On the 20th of November 2020, the British Institute of International and Comparative…

Read More
Courts and Tribunals+2
Human Rights and IHLRule of Law

ArbitrationArtificial IntelligenceBrexitBusiness and Human RightsCentre for Comparative LawCentre for International LawClimate ChangeClimate Law and Litigation BlogCollective RedressComparative LawCompetition LawCourts and TribunalsCOVID-19Cultural HeritageCyberspaceEnergyEnvironmental LawEuropean LawGovernanceHuman Rights and IHLICLQIntellectual PropertyInternational LawInternational LitigationInvestment and TradeLabour RightsLaw and ChangeLaw of the SeaMaurice WohlMigrationModern SlaveryProduct Liability LawReimagining the LawRule of LawState ImmunityTrainingUkraine

We use cookies to give you the best online experience. Please let us know if you agree to all of these cookies

What are cookies?

Cookies are small pieces of information that are stored on your computer to allow the British Institute of International and Comparative Law to recognise it when you visit our site. They can remember your preferences by gathering and storing information. They do not identify you as an individual user, just the computer used. Cookies cannot be used to run programs or compromise your security. Cookies do not give the British Institute of International and Comparative Law access to your computer.

What types of essential cookies does BIICL use?

We may use cookies to store information about your membership on our site, or to enable you to log in to online resources. This might include registering for our events, making online purchases or accessing member-only content. The information is stored, as cookies, to enable you to use these resources, and to remember your log in details between sessions. If you clear your cookies, you may need to login to these parts of the website each time you visit.

We also use some third party cookies to help us improve your user experience.

If you don't want to use third party cookies.

If you would prefer not to use third party cookies while browsing our site, you can set your browser so that it will not download cookies onto your computer. Doing so will still allow you to navigate through the majority of our site but possibly not all of it. If you wish to access the password protected areas of our website you will need to allow "per-session" cookies. These are temporarily used while you are visiting the site but deleted when you close your browser or log out.

Yes, I agree.

No, take me to settings

BIICL Blog

Read our latest blog posts

Welcome to the BIICL Blog hosted by the research team at the British Institute of International and Comparative Law (BIICL)

Does the approach of the Multilateral Investment Court to appointment of judges appropriately balance interests of States and investors?

Trafficked persons on trial in the United Kingdom: Court of Appeal provides new guidance on abuse of process and available defences

Reviewing the Review: What Needs to Change at the International Criminal Court?