What are cookies?
Cookies are small pieces of information that are stored on your computer to allow the British Institute of International and Comparative Law to recognise it when you visit our site. They can remember your preferences by gathering and storing information. They do not identify you as an individual user, just the computer used. Cookies cannot be used to run programs or compromise your security. Cookies do not give the British Institute of International and Comparative Law access to your computer.
What types of essential cookies does BIICL use?
We may use cookies to store information about your membership on our site, or to enable you to log in to online resources. This might include registering for our events, making online purchases or accessing member-only content. The information is stored, as cookies, to enable you to use these resources, and to remember your log in details between sessions. If you clear your cookies, you may need to login to these parts of the website each time you visit.
We also use some third party cookies to help us improve your user experience.
If you don't want to use third party cookies.
If you would prefer not to use third party cookies while browsing our site, you can set your browser so that it will not download cookies onto your computer. Doing so will still allow you to navigate through the majority of our site but possibly not all of it. If you wish to access the password protected areas of our website you will need to allow "per-session" cookies. These are temporarily used while you are visiting the site but deleted when you close your browser or log out.
Reimagining Treaty Bodies
Reimagining Treaty Bodies
10 December
The domestic influence of treaty bodies' jurisprudence should be strengthened. This could be accomplished by increasing the visibility of their work, including access to their jurisprudence, enhancing human rights education globally, comparatively interpreting human rights, pressuring governments to honour their international legal obligations, and effectively implementing human rights treaties domestically.
Dr Leena Grover
Are major structural reforms needed?
Without amending the treaties, the two Covenant bodies will be merged. Other treaty bodies will have some members who also serve on this Human Rights Committee. There will be a court-like Chamber for individual cases. This Chamber would functionally, and then formally, develop into a World Human Rights Court.
Professor Martin Scheinin
Treaty Bodies hold the promise of holding states accountable for failing to implement human rights law, and reinterpreting it against new developments in society, technology and other international law branches. Under-funding treaty bodies, under-staffing their secretariat and affording them limited political support continue to hold back that promise.
Professor Yuval Shany
Complementarity between the UN treaty body system and the system of "Universal Periodic Review" by the UN Human Rights Council should be maximized, in particular by the integration of reviews of State reports by treaty bodies with reviews in the context of the UPR. Reports as well as procedures should be harmonized.
Judge Bruno Simma
Human rights treaty bodies, such as the UN Human Rights Committee, may receive complaints from individuals. In a time of skepticism to formal institutions they should utilize their flexibility as hard law institutions without being courts. However, they should earn their status by adopting legally responsible outcomes.
Professor Geir Ulfstein
Related Entries
Reimagining the law video presentations Michael Olatokun
28th January 2021
Read More
Reimagining the law video presentations Jeremy Gilley
27th January 2021
Read More
Reimagining the law video presentations Andrew Wells
26th January 2021
Read More