What are cookies?
Cookies are small pieces of information that are stored on your computer to allow the British Institute of International and Comparative Law to recognise it when you visit our site. They can remember your preferences by gathering and storing information. They do not identify you as an individual user, just the computer used. Cookies cannot be used to run programs or compromise your security. Cookies do not give the British Institute of International and Comparative Law access to your computer.
What types of essential cookies does BIICL use?
We may use cookies to store information about your membership on our site, or to enable you to log in to online resources. This might include registering for our events, making online purchases or accessing member-only content. The information is stored, as cookies, to enable you to use these resources, and to remember your log in details between sessions. If you clear your cookies, you may need to login to these parts of the website each time you visit.
We also use some third party cookies to help us improve your user experience.
If you don't want to use third party cookies.
If you would prefer not to use third party cookies while browsing our site, you can set your browser so that it will not download cookies onto your computer. Doing so will still allow you to navigate through the majority of our site but possibly not all of it. If you wish to access the password protected areas of our website you will need to allow "per-session" cookies. These are temporarily used while you are visiting the site but deleted when you close your browser or log out.
Reimagining Regional Human Rights Courts 9 December
Reimagining Regional Human Rights Courts
9 December
Rethinking Enforcement of International Refugee Law
In the face of the worst refugee crisis since World War II, enforcement of the global legal framework for refugee protection must be reimagined. Perhaps what is needed is a specialized international mechanism that: 1). holds States accountable; while 2). Incentivizing them to protect refugees as a global public good.
Professor Hannah Garry
Reimagining the ECtHR as a Climate Court
Human rights adjudication has an unrealized potential to contribute to climate change mitigation. How could the European Court of Human Rights assume a leading role here? Undeniably, this would mean challenging existing approaches to victim status, jurisdiction, remedies, and subsidiarity, as well as requiring a proactive stance regarding the avoidance of impending climate-related harms.
Prof. Dr. iur. Helen Keller, LL.M. & Dr. Corina Heri, LL.M.
Regional courts should affirm explicitly that their jurisdiction extends to electronic surveillance and cyber operations conducted by states abroad, including attacks against hospitals, specific individuals, and disinformation operations. It would be unconscionable to permit states to commit violations abroad that they cannot commit on their own territory. Human rights courts should clearly say so.
Professor Marko Milanovic
The European Court of Human Rights has successfully dealt with the backlog of cases during the Interlaken Process. The future of the Court now requires a realignment towards the expeditious processing of priority cases and the delivery of high quality judgments having an immediate impact for applicants and the Convention system.
President Robert Spano
Related Entries
Reimagining the law video presentations Michael Olatokun
28th January 2021
Read More
Reimagining the law video presentations Jeremy Gilley
27th January 2021
Read More
Reimagining the law video presentations Andrew Wells
26th January 2021
Read More