What are cookies?
Cookies are small pieces of information that are stored on your computer to allow the British Institute of International and Comparative Law to recognise it when you visit our site. They can remember your preferences by gathering and storing information. They do not identify you as an individual user, just the computer used. Cookies cannot be used to run programs or compromise your security. Cookies do not give the British Institute of International and Comparative Law access to your computer.
What types of essential cookies does BIICL use?
We may use cookies to store information about your membership on our site, or to enable you to log in to online resources. This might include registering for our events, making online purchases or accessing member-only content. The information is stored, as cookies, to enable you to use these resources, and to remember your log in details between sessions. If you clear your cookies, you may need to login to these parts of the website each time you visit.
We also use some third party cookies to help us improve your user experience.
If you don't want to use third party cookies.
If you would prefer not to use third party cookies while browsing our site, you can set your browser so that it will not download cookies onto your computer. Doing so will still allow you to navigate through the majority of our site but possibly not all of it. If you wish to access the password protected areas of our website you will need to allow "per-session" cookies. These are temporarily used while you are visiting the site but deleted when you close your browser or log out.
Reimagining the International Court of Justice 8 December
Reimagining the International Court of Justice
8 December
[No!] Salvation does not lie in the compulsory jurisdiction of the Court but in the patient learning by States of the virtues of settling disputes by judicial means. It is not major and politically sensitive disputes that should be submitted to the Court, but the "lambda" disputes that poison bilateral relations [without threatening international peace and security].
Alain Pellet
The ICJ should work with two chambers (having identical jurisdiction) and the number of ICJ judges increased to the extent that both chambers would fulfil the criteria of representativeness required by the Statute. Judges should be elected for 12-year terms, re-election should be excluded. Ad hoc Judges should be retained.
Judge Bruno Simma
A century ago, when the World Court was established, James Brown Scott saw 'the hope of the ages in the process of realization'. As we approach a new century of international adjudication, I imagine an ICJ that is guided by this legacy, and aware that for many - students, activists, diplomats - it remains a beacon of hope.
Professor Christian J Tams
Recognising the evolution in the International Court's caseload and in the parties coming before it, preliminary objections should be on a fast-track timetable and made within 3 months of the Application, not Memorial; filings and judges' folders should be electronic unless otherwise agreed; and Spanish should be an official language.
Professor Philippa Webb
75 years after 1945 one should make the idea underlying Art. 10 (2) ICJ Statute a reality, namely that the election of ICJ judges shall also de facto be made without any distinction between candidates who are nationals of permanent members of the Security Council and those who are not.
Andreas Zimmermann
Related Entries
Reimagining the law video presentations Michael Olatokun
28th January 2021
Read More
Reimagining the law video presentations Jeremy Gilley
27th January 2021
Read More
Reimagining the law video presentations Andrew Wells
26th January 2021
Read More